skills: Add /grill and /domain-modeling
This commit is contained in:
56
.claude/skills/domain-modeling/SKILL.md
Normal file
56
.claude/skills/domain-modeling/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: domain-modeling
|
||||
description: Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Domain Modeling
|
||||
|
||||
Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the *active* discipline — challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely *reading* `.claude/CONTEXT.md` for vocabulary is not this skill — that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)
|
||||
|
||||
## File structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/
|
||||
├── .claude/
|
||||
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
│ └── adr/
|
||||
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
|
||||
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
|
||||
└── src/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `.claude/CONTEXT.md` exists, create it when the first term is resolved. If no `.claude/adr/` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## During the session
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge against the glossary
|
||||
|
||||
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `.claude/CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
|
||||
|
||||
### Sharpen fuzzy language
|
||||
|
||||
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
|
||||
|
||||
### Discuss concrete scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-reference with code
|
||||
|
||||
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
|
||||
|
||||
### Update .claude/CONTEXT.md inline
|
||||
|
||||
When a term is resolved, update `.claude/CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
|
||||
`.claude/CONTEXT.md` should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat `.claude/CONTEXT.md` as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.
|
||||
|
||||
### Offer ADRs sparingly
|
||||
|
||||
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
|
||||
2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
|
||||
3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
|
||||
|
||||
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user