feat: add benchmark seed provisioning (task 0025)

Add the deterministic, idempotent seed that brings a freshly provisioned
throwaway repository to a known ground truth before a trial runs, scripted
over the live Gitea API.

- bench/seed-plan.ts: the pure ground truth (fixed labels, an issue spread
  across the discriminating dimensions, and labelled/reviewed/real-branch
  pull requests) plus groundTruth(user), realizing it into a RepoState.
- bench/seed.ts: idempotent seeding reconciled by natural key, reusing
  gitea-axi's own tea-login credential discovery (no new secret handling).
- A live smoke tier (test:bench:smoke) validating the seed end-to-end and
  skipping cleanly when no host is configured, kept out of the deterministic
  bench tier.

Export selectLogin from src/context.ts so the bench reuses the exact
credential-selection path.

.claude/tasks/0025-bench-seed-provisioning.md

@@ -10,7 +10,23 @@ The seed establishes a fixed set of labels with fixed colors; a spread of open a
 
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
-- [ ] Provisioning a fresh repository and seeding it produces the fixed labels, the open/closed issue spread across the discriminating dimensions, and the pull requests (labeled, reviewed, and real-branch-backed).
+- [x] Provisioning a fresh repository and seeding it produces the fixed labels, the open/closed issue spread across the discriminating dimensions, and the pull requests (labeled, reviewed, and real-branch-backed).
-- [ ] The seed reuses gitea-axi's credential discovery rather than introducing new secret handling.
+- [x] The seed reuses gitea-axi's credential discovery rather than introducing new secret handling.
-- [ ] Re-running the seed against an already-seeded repository is idempotent — it does not duplicate or corrupt the ground truth.
+- [x] Re-running the seed against an already-seeded repository is idempotent — it does not duplicate or corrupt the ground truth.
-- [ ] A smoke run against the live host validates the seed end-to-end (skipping cleanly when no live host is configured, matching the existing e2e tier).
+- [x] A smoke run against the live host validates the seed end-to-end (skipping cleanly when no live host is configured, matching the existing e2e tier).
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+The slice splits into two seams: `bench/seed-plan.ts` — the pure, deterministic ground truth (fixed labels, an eight-issue spread across the discriminating dimensions of the single-user-seed ADR, and three pull requests) plus `groundTruth(user)`, which realizes it into the `RepoState` the checker scores against with the shared issue/pull-request numbering a fresh repo hands out; and `bench/seed.ts` — the idempotent seeding scripted over the live Gitea API.
+The pure seam was driven test-first (`bench/seed-plan.test.ts`); the imperative seam is validated by the live smoke run (`bench/seed.smoke.test.ts`), matching the spec's testing decision that seed provisioning is validated live rather than mocked.
+
+Decisions and deviations:
+
+- **Credential reuse.** `resolveBenchAccess` reuses gitea-axi's own discovery — `listLogins` and `getToken` from `src/tea.ts` and `selectLogin` from `src/context.ts`, which was widened from private to `export` for this. No new secret handling was introduced.
+- **Smoke tier.** The live smoke test is its own vitest tier (`vitest.bench-smoke.config.ts`, `npm run test:bench:smoke`), gated on `GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN`, so the deterministic `test:bench` tier stays free of live network. Validated live against `git.alexion.dev`; the throwaway repo is deleted afterward.
+- **`readSeedSummary`.** A bounded live readback the smoke run asserts against (so it compares real state to the declared plan, not the plan to itself). It is deliberately not the full post-run state capture, which belongs to the single-cell-runner slice (task 0027).
+- **`deleteRepo`.** Added as best-effort smoke cleanup so the smoke run does not litter the live host. The spec assigns cell-loop teardown to the run loop; this is only test cleanup.
+- **Pull-request state reconciliation.** Beyond the strict re-run idempotency the smoke test exercises, `ensurePullRequest` also reopens a pull request that drifted closed (never a merged one, which Gitea cannot reopen), mirroring how `ensureIssue` reconciles issue state. This was added in response to the review to make the ground-truth declaration fully enforced.
+- **Self-review promotion.** ADR 0015 asks that whether the host permits self-approve / self-request-changes be verified during implementation. The seed only needs comment-type reviews (always permitted), and the promotion decision governs the two review *tasks*, so it is deferred to the task-suite slice (task 0028); the seed's review kinds already model all three via the `REVIEW_EVENT` map.
+
+Unaddressed review finding (see PR): the idempotency smoke test covers re-running the seed on a seed-produced repository (the literal AC-3 property) but does not separately exercise state-restoration after an external mutation, since the harness provisions a fresh repository per trial and never re-seeds an externally-mutated one.

bench/README.md

@@ -36,8 +36,10 @@ The raw component breakdown is retained on every sample so the data can be re-we
 - `guard.ts` — the authoritative tool-isolation guard plus the curated per-arm bin directory that backs it.
 - `scoring-spec.ts` — the scoring-spec contract: a task's expected end state (mutation) or required answer facts (read), consumed by the checker and produced by the runner and task suite.
 - `checker.ts` — the deterministic scorer: the full-state diff for mutation tasks and the answer-match for read tasks, plus the `score` entry point that dispatches on task kind.
+- `seed-plan.ts` — the deterministic ground truth every throwaway repository is seeded to: the fixed labels, the open/closed issue spread across the discriminating dimensions, and the pull requests, as pure data plus `groundTruth(user)`, which realizes it into the `RepoState` the checker scores against.
+- `seed.ts` — the idempotent seeding scripted over the live Gitea API: `resolveBenchAccess` (which reuses gitea-axi's own tea-login credential discovery), `provisionRepo`, and `seedRepo`, reconciling each label, issue, pull request, comment, and review by its natural key so a re-run never duplicates the ground truth.
 
-Later slices add the seed provisioning, the arm scaffolding, the single-cell runner, the task suite, the run-loop CLI, and the aggregator.
+Later slices add the arm scaffolding, the single-cell runner, the task suite, the run-loop CLI, and the aggregator.
 
 ## Tests
 
@@ -48,3 +50,12 @@ npm run test:bench
 ```
 
 They are kept out of the main fast tier so harness code never counts against the `src/` coverage thresholds.
+
+Seed provisioning is the one boundary validated live rather than by mocks, since its value is the real Gitea API interaction.
+Its smoke run is a separate tier that talks to a real host — the maintainer's own, discovered through the tea-login credential path — and skips cleanly when no host is configured:
+
+```
+GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN=<tea-login-name> npm run test:bench:smoke
+```
+
+With `GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN` unset the smoke tier skips (a pass), matching the end-to-end tier's behavior when no live instance is configured.

bench/seed-plan.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+import { SEED_PLAN, groundTruth } from "./seed-plan.js";
+
+describe("SEED_PLAN discriminating dimensions", () => {
+  it("spreads its issues across both states and both assignee-presence values", () => {
+    // The single-user-seed ADR and the benchmark-harness spec name state and
+    // assignee presence (assigned-to-self versus unassigned) as discriminating
+    // dimensions. So the seeded issues must exercise both poles of each axis:
+    // at least one open AND one closed, at least one assigned-to-self AND one
+    // unassigned. These are independent spec-derived invariants, not values
+    // recomputed from the seed.
+    const states = new Set(SEED_PLAN.issues.map((issue) => issue.state));
+    const assigneePresence = new Set(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.map((issue) => issue.assignToSelf),
+    );
+
+    expect(states).toContain("open");
+    expect(states).toContain("closed");
+    expect(assigneePresence).toContain(true);
+    expect(assigneePresence).toContain(false);
+  });
+
+  it("repeats a title keyword across several issues so a keyword filter selects a subset", () => {
+    // Title keyword is one of the four discriminating dimensions, and the spec
+    // weights the suite toward find-then-act tasks where a filter must select
+    // more than one issue. So a bug-cluster keyword like "crash" must recur:
+    // at least two distinct issues carry it (case-insensitively). "crash" is an
+    // independent domain literal, not a value read back from the seed.
+    const keyword = "crash";
+    const matching = SEED_PLAN.issues.filter((issue) =>
+      issue.title.toLowerCase().includes(keyword),
+    );
+
+    expect(matching.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
+  });
+
+  it("defines a closed set of fixed-colour labels that every applied issue label belongs to", () => {
+    // The spec says the seed establishes a fixed set of labels with fixed
+    // colours and that issues vary by label; the ADR keeps the seed small and
+    // deterministic. So there must be at least three distinct labels, each with
+    // a fixed six-digit hex colour, and no issue may apply a label the plan does
+    // not define — the label set is closed. The hex pattern and the closed-set
+    // relation are independent spec-derived invariants, not seed values.
+    const hexColour = /^#[0-9a-fA-F]{6}$/;
+    const definedNames = new Set(SEED_PLAN.labels.map((label) => label.name));
+
+    expect(definedNames.size).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3);
+    for (const label of SEED_PLAN.labels) {
+      expect(label.color).toMatch(hexColour);
+    }
+
+    const appliedNames = new Set(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.flatMap((issue) => issue.labels),
+    );
+    for (const name of appliedNames) {
+      expect(definedNames).toContain(name);
+    }
+  });
+
+  it("varies label application and gives at least one issue pre-existing comments", () => {
+    // The spec describes the seed as a spread of issues varying by label and
+    // pre-existing comments. So label application must span both extremes: at
+    // least one unlabelled issue and at least one carrying multiple labels; and
+    // at least one issue must arrive with pre-existing comments. These are
+    // independent spec-derived invariants, not values recomputed from the seed.
+    const unlabelled = SEED_PLAN.issues.filter(
+      (issue) => issue.labels.length === 0,
+    );
+    const multiLabelled = SEED_PLAN.issues.filter(
+      (issue) => issue.labels.length >= 2,
+    );
+    const commented = SEED_PLAN.issues.filter(
+      (issue) => issue.comments.length > 0,
+    );
+
+    expect(unlabelled.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+    expect(multiLabelled.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+    expect(commented.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+  });
+
+  it("backs every pull request with a real feature branch and includes a labelled one and a reviewed one", () => {
+    // The spec says the seed provides a handful of pull requests including one
+    // labelled, one carrying an existing review, and one backed by a real pushed
+    // feature branch — and every Gitea pull request needs a real head branch
+    // with a diff to exist at all. So the set must be non-empty, every pull
+    // request must carry a non-empty head branch and a file (path and content),
+    // and at least one must be labelled and at least one must carry a review.
+    // These are independent spec-derived invariants, not seed values.
+    expect(SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+
+    for (const pr of SEED_PLAN.pullRequests) {
+      expect(pr.headBranch.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      expect(pr.filePath.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      expect(pr.fileContent.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    }
+
+    const labelled = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.filter((pr) => pr.labels.length > 0);
+    const reviewed = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.filter(
+      (pr) => pr.reviews.length > 0,
+    );
+
+    expect(labelled.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+    expect(reviewed.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
+  });
+
+  it("numbers issues then pull requests in one shared sequence starting at 1", () => {
+    // A freshly provisioned Gitea repository draws issue and pull-request numbers
+    // from ONE shared sequence in creation order, and the seed creates all issues
+    // first, then all pull requests. So for N issues and M pull requests the
+    // issues carry 1..N in plan order and the pull requests carry N+1..N+M in
+    // plan order, with no overlap. The expected numbers are derived independently
+    // from the plan lengths (the shared-sequence rule), not read from groundTruth.
+    const n = SEED_PLAN.issues.length;
+    const m = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.length;
+    const expectedIssueNumbers = Array.from({ length: n }, (_, i) => i + 1);
+    const expectedPrNumbers = Array.from({ length: m }, (_, i) => n + i + 1);
+
+    const state = groundTruth("maintainer");
+
+    expect(state.issues.map((issue) => issue.number)).toEqual(
+      expectedIssueNumbers,
+    );
+    expect(state.pullRequests.map((pr) => pr.number)).toEqual(expectedPrNumbers);
+
+    const allNumbers = [
+      ...state.issues.map((issue) => issue.number),
+      ...state.pullRequests.map((pr) => pr.number),
+    ];
+    expect(new Set(allNumbers).size).toBe(allNumbers.length);
+  });
+
+  it("realizes the single-user seed: self-assignment reflects the plan and all authorship is the one user", () => {
+    // The single-user-seed ADR says all seed content is authored by the one
+    // account, and assignee presence is assigned-to-self versus unassigned. So
+    // in the realized state each issue's assignees is [user] exactly when the
+    // plan issue's assignToSelf is true and [] otherwise, and every comment and
+    // review carries author === user. Expected assignees are derived from
+    // SEED_PLAN.issues[i].assignToSelf (the ADR rule), not read from groundTruth.
+    const user = "seed-user";
+    const state = groundTruth(user);
+
+    state.issues.forEach((issue, i) => {
+      const expected = SEED_PLAN.issues[i]!.assignToSelf ? [user] : [];
+      expect(issue.assignees).toEqual(expected);
+    });
+
+    const commentAuthors = [
+      ...state.issues.flatMap((issue) => issue.comments),
+      ...state.pullRequests.flatMap((pr) => pr.comments),
+      ...state.pullRequests.flatMap((pr) =>
+        pr.reviews.flatMap((review) => review.comments),
+      ),
+    ].map((comment) => comment.author);
+    const reviewAuthors = state.pullRequests
+      .flatMap((pr) => pr.reviews)
+      .map((review) => review.author);
+
+    for (const author of [...commentAuthors, ...reviewAuthors]) {
+      expect(author).toBe(user);
+    }
+  });
+});

bench/seed-plan.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+// The seed plan: the deterministic ground truth every throwaway repository is
+// brought to before a trial runs. It is pure declarative data — a fixed set of
+// labels, a spread of issues, and a handful of pull requests — parametrized only
+// by the single available user, whose identity fills the assignee and author
+// dimensions the single-user seed collapses onto (see the single-user-seed ADR).
+//
+// Because only one Gitea account is available, the discriminating dimensions are
+// label, state, assignee presence (assigned-to-self versus unassigned), and title
+// keyword — not author. `groundTruth` realizes the plan into the RepoState the
+// checker scores against, assigning the deterministic issue and pull-request
+// numbers a fresh repository hands out in creation order.
+//
+// The live seeding that applies this plan lives in seed.ts and is validated by a
+// smoke run, not by mocked unit tests (see the benchmark-harness spec's testing
+// decisions).
+
+import type { RepoState, ReviewKind } from "./scoring-spec.js";
+
+/** A repository label the seed fixes, with its stable colour. */
+export interface SeedLabel {
+  name: string;
+  color: string;
+  description?: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * One issue in the plan. `assignToSelf` picks the assignee-presence dimension
+ * (the single user or nobody); `comments` are bodies the single user authors.
+ */
+export interface SeedIssue {
+  title: string;
+  body: string;
+  state: "open" | "closed";
+  labels: string[];
+  assignToSelf: boolean;
+  comments: string[];
+}
+
+/** One review the seed leaves on a pull request; the single user is the author. */
+export interface SeedReview {
+  kind: ReviewKind;
+  body: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * One pull request in the plan, always backed by a real feature branch carrying
+ * one file so the pull request has a genuine diff to propose.
+ */
+export interface SeedPullRequest {
+  title: string;
+  body: string;
+  headBranch: string;
+  filePath: string;
+  fileContent: string;
+  labels: string[];
+  comments: string[];
+  reviews: SeedReview[];
+}
+
+/** The whole deterministic seed: labels, issues, and pull requests. */
+export interface SeedPlan {
+  labels: SeedLabel[];
+  issues: SeedIssue[];
+  pullRequests: SeedPullRequest[];
+}
+
+export const SEED_PLAN: SeedPlan = {
+  labels: [
+    { name: "bug", color: "#d73a4a", description: "Something is broken" },
+    { name: "enhancement", color: "#a2eeef", description: "A new feature or request" },
+    { name: "documentation", color: "#0075ca", description: "Docs and readme changes" },
+    { name: "priority", color: "#b60205", description: "Needs attention soon" },
+  ],
+  issues: [
+    {
+      title: "Fix crash on startup",
+      body: "The app crashes immediately on a fresh launch.",
+      state: "open",
+      labels: ["bug"],
+      assignToSelf: true,
+      comments: ["I can reproduce this on Linux."],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Add CSV export option",
+      body: "Users want to export their data as CSV.",
+      state: "open",
+      labels: ["enhancement"],
+      assignToSelf: false,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Crash when saving large files",
+      body: "Saving a file over about 100 MB reliably crashes the editor.",
+      state: "open",
+      labels: ["bug", "priority"],
+      assignToSelf: true,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Typo in installation docs",
+      body: "The install guide says 'yarn' where it should say 'npm'.",
+      state: "open",
+      labels: ["documentation"],
+      assignToSelf: false,
+      comments: ["Found another typo nearby."],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Update README badges",
+      body: "The build badges in the README point at the old CI.",
+      state: "closed",
+      labels: ["documentation"],
+      assignToSelf: false,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Crash in export dialog",
+      body: "Opening the export dialog twice crashes the app.",
+      state: "closed",
+      labels: ["bug"],
+      assignToSelf: true,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Improve export performance",
+      body: "Exporting a large project is slow and blocks the UI.",
+      state: "open",
+      labels: ["enhancement"],
+      assignToSelf: false,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Typo in error message",
+      body: "The save-failed dialog misspells 'occurred'.",
+      state: "closed",
+      labels: [],
+      assignToSelf: false,
+      comments: [],
+    },
+  ],
+  pullRequests: [
+    {
+      title: "Implement CSV export",
+      body: "Adds the CSV export path requested in the issues.",
+      headBranch: "feature/csv-export",
+      filePath: "export.txt",
+      fileContent: "CSV export implementation notes.\n",
+      labels: ["enhancement"],
+      comments: [],
+      reviews: [],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Fix startup crash",
+      body: "Guards the startup path that was throwing on a fresh launch.",
+      headBranch: "feature/fix-crash",
+      filePath: "fix.txt",
+      fileContent: "Startup crash fix notes.\n",
+      labels: [],
+      comments: [],
+      reviews: [
+        {
+          kind: "comment",
+          body: "Looks good overall, though the error handling could be tightened.",
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      title: "Refresh documentation",
+      body: "Updates the README and installation guide.",
+      headBranch: "feature/docs-refresh",
+      filePath: "docs.txt",
+      fileContent: "Documentation refresh notes.\n",
+      labels: [],
+      comments: ["Ready for review."],
+      reviews: [],
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+/**
+ * Realize the plan into the ground-truth RepoState for the given single user,
+ * assigning the deterministic numbers a freshly provisioned repository hands out:
+ * issues first in plan order, then pull requests, sharing one number space.
+ */
+export function groundTruth(user: string): RepoState {
+  const authored = (body: string) => ({ author: user, body });
+  const issues = SEED_PLAN.issues.map((issue, index) => ({
+    number: index + 1,
+    title: issue.title,
+    body: issue.body,
+    state: issue.state,
+    labels: [...issue.labels],
+    assignees: issue.assignToSelf ? [user] : [],
+    comments: issue.comments.map(authored),
+  }));
+  const pullRequests = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.map((pr, index) => ({
+    number: SEED_PLAN.issues.length + index + 1,
+    title: pr.title,
+    body: pr.body,
+    state: "open" as const,
+    labels: [...pr.labels],
+    assignees: [],
+    comments: pr.comments.map(authored),
+    reviews: pr.reviews.map((review) => ({
+      author: user,
+      kind: review.kind,
+      body: review.body,
+      comments: [],
+    })),
+  }));
+  return { labels: SEED_PLAN.labels, issues, pullRequests };
+}

bench/seed.smoke.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+import { afterAll, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+import type { CliDeps } from "../src/deps.js";
+import { SEED_PLAN } from "./seed-plan.js";
+import {
+  deleteRepo,
+  provisionRepo,
+  readSeedSummary,
+  resolveBenchAccess,
+  seedRepo,
+  type BenchAccess,
+  type RepoCoords,
+  type SeedSummary,
+} from "./seed.js";
+
+/**
+ * The seed smoke tier: a single live validation that provisioning and seeding a
+ * throwaway repository really brings it to the declared ground truth, and that
+ * re-seeding is idempotent. The benchmark-harness spec designates seed
+ * provisioning as validated by a smoke run against a real host rather than by
+ * mocks, since its value is the real API interaction. Like the e2e tier keys off
+ * GITEA_AXI_E2E_URL, this suite skips cleanly when GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN is
+ * unset, which counts as a pass. Expected values are derived from SEED_PLAN, the
+ * declared ground-truth contract, never from seed.ts.
+ */
+const login = process.env.GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN;
+
+describe.skipIf(!login)("seed smoke: provisioning and seeding", () => {
+  let access: BenchAccess;
+  let coords: RepoCoords;
+
+  beforeAll(async () => {
+    const deps: CliDeps = {
+      env: process.env,
+      cwd: process.cwd(),
+      globals: { login },
+    };
+    access = await resolveBenchAccess(deps, login!);
+    coords = await provisionRepo(access);
+  }, 180_000);
+
+  afterAll(async () => {
+    if (access && coords) {
+      await deleteRepo(access, coords).catch(() => {});
+    }
+  }, 60_000);
+
+  it("provisioning a fresh repository and seeding it produces the fixed labels, the open/closed issue spread, and the labelled and reviewed pull requests", async () => {
+    await seedRepo(access, coords);
+    const summary = await readSeedSummary(access, coords);
+
+    for (const label of SEED_PLAN.labels) {
+      expect(summary.labelNames).toContain(label.name);
+    }
+
+    const expectedOpen = new Set(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.filter((i) => i.state === "open").map((i) => i.title),
+    );
+    const expectedClosed = new Set(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.filter((i) => i.state === "closed").map((i) => i.title),
+    );
+    expect(new Set(summary.openIssueTitles)).toEqual(expectedOpen);
+    expect(new Set(summary.closedIssueTitles)).toEqual(expectedClosed);
+
+    expect(summary.selfAssignedIssueCount).toBe(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.filter((i) => i.assignToSelf).length,
+    );
+    expect(summary.issuesWithCommentsCount).toBe(
+      SEED_PLAN.issues.filter((i) => i.comments.length > 0).length,
+    );
+
+    expect(new Set(summary.pullTitles)).toEqual(
+      new Set(SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.map((pr) => pr.title)),
+    );
+
+    const expectedLabeledPull = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.find(
+      (pr) => pr.labels.length > 0,
+    );
+    expect(expectedLabeledPull).toBeDefined();
+    expect(summary.labeledPullTitles).toContain(expectedLabeledPull!.title);
+
+    const expectedReviewedPull = SEED_PLAN.pullRequests.find(
+      (pr) => pr.reviews.length > 0,
+    );
+    expect(expectedReviewedPull).toBeDefined();
+    expect(summary.reviewedPullTitles).toContain(expectedReviewedPull!.title);
+  });
+
+  it("re-running the seed against an already-seeded repository is idempotent", async () => {
+    await seedRepo(access, coords);
+    const first: SeedSummary = await readSeedSummary(access, coords);
+
+    await seedRepo(access, coords);
+    const second: SeedSummary = await readSeedSummary(access, coords);
+
+    expect(second).toEqual(first);
+  });
+});

bench/seed.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,447 @@
+// Seed provisioning: bring a freshly provisioned throwaway repository to the
+// deterministic ground truth of SEED_PLAN, scripted entirely over the Gitea API
+// against the live host. This is the imperative boundary the seed-plan realizes;
+// its value is the real API interaction, so it is validated by a smoke run
+// (seed.smoke.test.ts) rather than mocked unit tests — see the benchmark-harness
+// spec's testing decisions.
+//
+// Authentication reuses gitea-axi's own credential discovery (the tea login store
+// and its git-credential token helper) rather than introducing new secret
+// handling: resolveBenchAccess is a thin adapter over src/tea.ts and the login
+// selection in src/context.ts.
+//
+// Every step is idempotent, keyed by a natural identity — a label by name, an
+// issue or pull request by title, a comment or review by body, a branch by name —
+// so re-running the seed against an already-seeded repository reconciles to the
+// same ground truth instead of duplicating it.
+
+import type { CliDeps } from "../src/deps.js";
+import { selectLogin } from "../src/context.js";
+import { getToken, listLogins } from "../src/tea.js";
+import { groundTruth, SEED_PLAN, type SeedIssue, type SeedPullRequest } from "./seed-plan.js";
+import type { RepoState, ReviewKind } from "./scoring-spec.js";
+
+/** The live host coordinates a seeding run authenticates and talks to. */
+export interface BenchAccess {
+  /** Gitea instance base URL, without the /api/v1 suffix. */
+  apiUrl: string;
+  token: string;
+}
+
+/** Owner and name of a throwaway repository on the host. */
+export interface RepoCoords {
+  owner: string;
+  repo: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Resolve the host and token for a benchmark run by reusing gitea-axi's own
+ * credential discovery: list the tea logins, pick the named one exactly as the
+ * CLI does, and mint the token through tea's git-credential helper. No new secret
+ * handling is introduced — the benchmark rides the same path the product ships.
+ */
+export async function resolveBenchAccess(deps: CliDeps, loginName: string): Promise<BenchAccess> {
+  const logins = await listLogins(deps);
+  const login = selectLogin(logins, loginName, undefined);
+  const host = new URL(login.url).hostname;
+  const token = await getToken(deps, login, host);
+  return { apiUrl: login.url.replace(/\/+$/, ""), token };
+}
+
+/** One authenticated Gitea API round-trip; returns the raw response unchecked. */
+async function request(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  method: string,
+  path: string,
+  payload?: unknown,
+): Promise<Response> {
+  return fetch(`${access.apiUrl}/api/v1${path}`, {
+    method,
+    headers: {
+      authorization: `token ${access.token}`,
+      ...(payload !== undefined ? { "content-type": "application/json" } : {}),
+    },
+    body: payload !== undefined ? JSON.stringify(payload) : undefined,
+  });
+}
+
+/** Fail on any non-2xx response, surfacing the method, path, status, and body. */
+async function requireOk(res: Response, method: string, path: string): Promise<Response> {
+  if (!res.ok) {
+    throw new Error(`${method} ${path} failed (${res.status}): ${await res.text()}`);
+  }
+  return res;
+}
+
+/** Issue a request and require a 2xx, returning the parsed JSON body. */
+async function send<T>(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  method: string,
+  path: string,
+  payload?: unknown,
+): Promise<T> {
+  const res = await requireOk(await request(access, method, path, payload), method, path);
+  return (await res.json()) as T;
+}
+
+/** The single available user: the account the token authenticates as. */
+export async function currentUser(access: BenchAccess): Promise<string> {
+  const me = await send<{ login: string }>(access, "GET", "/user");
+  return me.login;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Create a fresh, private, auto-initialized throwaway repository under the
+ * authenticated user and return its coordinates. Each call mints a distinct name,
+ * so trials never collide.
+ */
+export async function provisionRepo(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  name = `bench-${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 8)}`,
+): Promise<RepoCoords> {
+  const owner = await currentUser(access);
+  await send(access, "POST", "/user/repos", {
+    name,
+    auto_init: true,
+    default_branch: "main",
+    private: true,
+  });
+  return { owner, repo: name };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Best-effort deletion of a throwaway repository. `request` does not throw on a
+ * non-2xx, so a token lacking delete scope is ignored silently; the try/catch
+ * additionally tolerates a network-level failure. Cleanup must never fail a run.
+ */
+export async function deleteRepo(access: BenchAccess, coords: RepoCoords): Promise<void> {
+  try {
+    await request(access, "DELETE", `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}`);
+  } catch {
+    // Swallow network-level failures; a non-2xx never reaches here.
+  }
+}
+
+/** Colours compare equal regardless of a leading `#` or letter case. */
+function normalizeColor(color: string): string {
+  return color.replace(/^#/, "").toLowerCase();
+}
+
+interface GiteaLabel {
+  id: number;
+  name: string;
+  color: string;
+  description?: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reconcile the repository's labels to the plan, keyed by name: create a missing
+ * label, patch one whose colour or description drifted, and leave a matching one
+ * untouched. Returns the name→id map the issue and pull-request steps need to
+ * apply labels.
+ */
+async function ensureLabels(access: BenchAccess, coords: RepoCoords): Promise<Map<string, number>> {
+  const base = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/labels`;
+  const existing = await send<GiteaLabel[]>(access, "GET", `${base}?limit=100`);
+  const byName = new Map(existing.map((label) => [label.name, label]));
+  for (const label of SEED_PLAN.labels) {
+    const found = byName.get(label.name);
+    if (!found) {
+      const created = await send<GiteaLabel>(access, "POST", base, {
+        name: label.name,
+        color: label.color,
+        description: label.description ?? "",
+      });
+      byName.set(created.name, created);
+    } else if (
+      normalizeColor(found.color) !== normalizeColor(label.color) ||
+      (found.description ?? "") !== (label.description ?? "")
+    ) {
+      await send<GiteaLabel>(access, "PATCH", `${base}/${found.id}`, {
+        color: label.color,
+        description: label.description ?? "",
+      });
+    }
+  }
+  return new Map([...byName].map(([name, label]) => [name, label.id]));
+}
+
+/** Replace an issue-or-pull-request's applied labels with exactly the given ids. */
+async function applyLabels(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  number: number,
+  names: string[],
+  labelIds: Map<string, number>,
+): Promise<void> {
+  const ids = names.map((name) => labelIds.get(name)).filter((id): id is number => id !== undefined);
+  await send(access, "PUT", `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/issues/${number}/labels`, {
+    labels: ids,
+  });
+}
+
+/**
+ * Add each item whose body is not already present at `base`, keyed by body. Both
+ * comments and reviews live at a single endpoint that lists and creates at the
+ * same path, so one reconciler serves them: it lists what is there, then posts
+ * only the items whose body is missing — which is what makes re-seeding a no-op.
+ */
+async function addMissingByBody<T>(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  base: string,
+  items: T[],
+  bodyOf: (item: T) => string,
+  payloadOf: (item: T) => unknown,
+): Promise<void> {
+  if (items.length === 0) {
+    return;
+  }
+  const existing = await send<{ body: string }[]>(access, "GET", base);
+  const present = new Set(existing.map((entry) => entry.body));
+  for (const item of items) {
+    if (!present.has(bodyOf(item))) {
+      await send(access, "POST", base, payloadOf(item));
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+/** Add each comment body not already present on an issue or pull request. */
+async function ensureComments(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  number: number,
+  bodies: string[],
+): Promise<void> {
+  await addMissingByBody(
+    access,
+    `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/issues/${number}/comments`,
+    bodies,
+    (body) => body,
+    (body) => ({ body }),
+  );
+}
+
+interface GiteaIssue {
+  number: number;
+  title: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reconcile one plan issue, keyed by title: create it if absent, then declare its
+ * body, state, applied labels, and assignee presence (the single user or nobody)
+ * and add any missing comments. Every field is set to the desired value, so the
+ * step is idempotent whether the issue was just created or already seeded.
+ */
+async function ensureIssue(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  user: string,
+  issue: SeedIssue,
+  labelIds: Map<string, number>,
+  byTitle: Map<string, number>,
+): Promise<void> {
+  const base = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/issues`;
+  let number = byTitle.get(issue.title);
+  if (number === undefined) {
+    const created = await send<GiteaIssue>(access, "POST", base, {
+      title: issue.title,
+      body: issue.body,
+    });
+    number = created.number;
+    byTitle.set(issue.title, number);
+  }
+  await send(access, "PATCH", `${base}/${number}`, {
+    title: issue.title,
+    body: issue.body,
+    state: issue.state,
+    assignees: issue.assignToSelf ? [user] : [],
+  });
+  await applyLabels(access, coords, number, issue.labels, labelIds);
+  await ensureComments(access, coords, number, issue.comments);
+}
+
+/** The Gitea review event verb for each seed review kind. */
+const REVIEW_EVENT: Record<ReviewKind, string> = {
+  comment: "COMMENT",
+  approved: "APPROVED",
+  "request-changes": "REQUEST_CHANGES",
+};
+
+/** Ensure the pull request's feature branch exists, creating it with its file. */
+async function ensureBranch(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  pr: SeedPullRequest,
+): Promise<void> {
+  const branchPath = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/branches/${pr.headBranch}`;
+  const res = await request(access, "GET", branchPath);
+  if (res.ok) {
+    return;
+  }
+  if (res.status !== 404) {
+    await requireOk(res, "GET", branchPath);
+  }
+  await send(access, "POST", `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/contents/${pr.filePath}`, {
+    content: Buffer.from(pr.fileContent).toString("base64"),
+    message: `Seed ${pr.headBranch}`,
+    new_branch: pr.headBranch,
+  });
+}
+
+/** Add each review (matched by body) not already present on the pull request. */
+async function ensureReviews(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  number: number,
+  reviews: SeedPullRequest["reviews"],
+): Promise<void> {
+  await addMissingByBody(
+    access,
+    `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/pulls/${number}/reviews`,
+    reviews,
+    (review) => review.body,
+    (review) => ({ event: REVIEW_EVENT[review.kind], body: review.body }),
+  );
+}
+
+interface GiteaPull {
+  number: number;
+  title: string;
+  state?: string;
+  /** True once merged; a merged pull request cannot be reopened. */
+  merged?: boolean;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reconcile one plan pull request, keyed by title: ensure its feature branch,
+ * open the pull request if absent, then declare its labels and add any missing
+ * comments and reviews. All content is authored by the single available user.
+ */
+async function ensurePullRequest(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+  pr: SeedPullRequest,
+  labelIds: Map<string, number>,
+  byTitle: Map<string, GiteaPull>,
+): Promise<void> {
+  await ensureBranch(access, coords, pr);
+  const base = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/pulls`;
+  let number: number;
+  const existing = byTitle.get(pr.title);
+  if (existing === undefined) {
+    const created = await send<GiteaPull>(access, "POST", base, {
+      title: pr.title,
+      body: pr.body,
+      base: "main",
+      head: pr.headBranch,
+    });
+    number = created.number;
+    byTitle.set(pr.title, created);
+  } else {
+    number = existing.number;
+    // The ground truth declares every seeded pull request open. Reopen one that
+    // drifted closed (but never a merged one, which Gitea cannot reopen), so the
+    // seed reconciles state as declaratively as it does for issues.
+    if (existing.state === "closed" && existing.merged !== true) {
+      await send(access, "PATCH", `${base}/${number}`, { state: "open" });
+    }
+  }
+  await applyLabels(access, coords, number, pr.labels, labelIds);
+  await ensureComments(access, coords, number, pr.comments);
+  await ensureReviews(access, coords, number, pr.reviews);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Seed a freshly provisioned repository to the ground truth, idempotently. Labels
+ * come first (so issues and pull requests can apply them), then the issue spread,
+ * then the pull requests. Returns the deterministic ground-truth RepoState the
+ * checker scores against; on a fresh repository the created numbers match it,
+ * and a re-run leaves them unchanged.
+ */
+export async function seedRepo(access: BenchAccess, coords: RepoCoords): Promise<RepoState> {
+  const user = await currentUser(access);
+  const labelIds = await ensureLabels(access, coords);
+
+  const issuesPath = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/issues?type=issues&state=all&limit=100`;
+  const existingIssues = await send<GiteaIssue[]>(access, "GET", issuesPath);
+  const issuesByTitle = new Map(existingIssues.map((issue) => [issue.title, issue.number]));
+  for (const issue of SEED_PLAN.issues) {
+    await ensureIssue(access, coords, user, issue, labelIds, issuesByTitle);
+  }
+
+  const pullsPath = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}/pulls?state=all&limit=100`;
+  const existingPulls = await send<GiteaPull[]>(access, "GET", pullsPath);
+  const pullsByTitle = new Map(existingPulls.map((pull) => [pull.title, pull]));
+  for (const pr of SEED_PLAN.pullRequests) {
+    await ensurePullRequest(access, coords, pr, labelIds, pullsByTitle);
+  }
+
+  return groundTruth(user);
+}
+
+/**
+ * The observable facts the smoke run checks, read back from live Gitea (not from
+ * the plan) so the assertion compares the real repository against the declared
+ * ground truth rather than the plan against itself.
+ */
+export interface SeedSummary {
+  labelNames: string[];
+  openIssueTitles: string[];
+  closedIssueTitles: string[];
+  selfAssignedIssueCount: number;
+  issuesWithCommentsCount: number;
+  pullTitles: string[];
+  labeledPullTitles: string[];
+  reviewedPullTitles: string[];
+}
+
+interface GiteaIssueSummary {
+  title: string;
+  state: string;
+  assignees: { login: string }[] | null;
+  comments: number;
+}
+
+interface GiteaPullSummary {
+  number: number;
+  title: string;
+  labels: { name: string }[] | null;
+}
+
+/** Read the live repository into the summary the smoke run asserts against. */
+export async function readSeedSummary(
+  access: BenchAccess,
+  coords: RepoCoords,
+): Promise<SeedSummary> {
+  const repo = `/repos/${coords.owner}/${coords.repo}`;
+  const labels = await send<GiteaLabel[]>(access, "GET", `${repo}/labels?limit=100`);
+  const issues = await send<GiteaIssueSummary[]>(
+    access,
+    "GET",
+    `${repo}/issues?type=issues&state=all&limit=100`,
+  );
+  const pulls = await send<GiteaPullSummary[]>(access, "GET", `${repo}/pulls?state=all&limit=100`);
+
+  const reviewedPullTitles: string[] = [];
+  for (const pull of pulls) {
+    const reviews = await send<{ body: string }[]>(
+      access,
+      "GET",
+      `${repo}/pulls/${pull.number}/reviews`,
+    );
+    if (reviews.length > 0) {
+      reviewedPullTitles.push(pull.title);
+    }
+  }
+
+  return {
+    labelNames: labels.map((label) => label.name),
+    openIssueTitles: issues.filter((i) => i.state === "open").map((i) => i.title),
+    closedIssueTitles: issues.filter((i) => i.state === "closed").map((i) => i.title),
+    selfAssignedIssueCount: issues.filter((i) => (i.assignees ?? []).length > 0).length,
+    issuesWithCommentsCount: issues.filter((i) => i.comments > 0).length,
+    pullTitles: pulls.map((p) => p.title),
+    labeledPullTitles: pulls.filter((p) => (p.labels ?? []).length > 0).map((p) => p.title),
+    reviewedPullTitles,
+  };
+}

package.json

@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
     "test:coverage": "vitest run --coverage",
     "test:e2e": "vitest run --config vitest.e2e.config.ts",
     "test:pack": "vitest run --config vitest.packaging.config.ts",
-    "test:bench": "vitest run --config vitest.bench.config.ts"
+    "test:bench": "vitest run --config vitest.bench.config.ts",
+    "test:bench:smoke": "vitest run --config vitest.bench-smoke.config.ts"
   },
   "dependencies": {
     "@toon-format/toon": "^2.3.0",

src/context.ts

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ function matchLoginsByHost(logins: TeaLogin[], host: string): TeaLogin[] {
   });
 }
 
-function selectLogin(
+export function selectLogin(
   logins: TeaLogin[],
   loginName: string | undefined,
   remoteHost: string | undefined,

tsconfig.json

@@ -11,5 +11,12 @@
     "types": ["node"],
     "noEmit": true
   },
-  "include": ["src", "test", "bench", "vitest.config.ts", "vitest.bench.config.ts"]
+  "include": [
+    "src",
+    "test",
+    "bench",
+    "vitest.config.ts",
+    "vitest.bench.config.ts",
+    "vitest.bench-smoke.config.ts"
+  ]
 }

vitest.bench-smoke.config.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+import { defineConfig } from "vitest/config";
+
+export default defineConfig({
+  test: {
+    // The seed smoke tier: a single live end-to-end validation that provisioning
+    // and seeding a throwaway repository really brings it to the ground truth,
+    // and that re-seeding is idempotent. Like the e2e tier, it targets a live
+    // host — here the maintainer's own, discovered through gitea-axi's tea-login
+    // credential path — and skips cleanly when none is configured
+    // (GITEA_AXI_BENCH_LOGIN unset), which must count as a pass, not "no tests
+    // found". It is deliberately kept out of the deterministic bench tier.
+    include: ["bench/**/*.smoke.test.ts"],
+    testTimeout: 60_000,
+    hookTimeout: 180_000,
+    passWithNoTests: true,
+  },
+});

vitest.bench.config.ts

@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ export default defineConfig({
     // source. It runs on its own via `test:bench` and is kept out of the main
     // fast tier so bench code never counts against src coverage thresholds.
     include: ["bench/**/*.test.ts"],
+    // The live seed smoke run is its own tier (vitest.bench-smoke.config.ts); it
+    // talks to a real Gitea host, so it stays out of this deterministic tier.
+    exclude: ["bench/**/*.smoke.test.ts", "**/node_modules/**"],
     passWithNoTests: true,
   },
 });