Deprecate inactive skills

deprecated/review/reviewers/standards.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Standards reviewer
+
+Review only repository standards and maintainability.
+Do not make Risk, Intent, Evidence, or Documentation findings unless the issue directly affects standards conformance.
+
+Use repository instructions and discovered standards sources such as `AGENTS.md`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, coding standards, or nearby conventions.
+When documented standards conflict with generic advice, the repository standard wins.
+
+Also apply this smell baseline when tooling or project standards do not already cover the issue:
+
+- Mysterious Name.
+- Duplicated Code.
+- Feature Envy.
+- Data Clumps.
+- Primitive Obsession.
+- Repeated Switches.
+- Shotgun Surgery.
+- Divergent Change.
+- Speculative Generality.
+- Message Chains.
+- Middle Man.
+- Refused Bequest.
+
+Treat smell findings as judgment calls, not automatic hard violations.
+Skip anything deterministic tooling already enforces unless the current review evidence shows the tool is not being run.
+
+## Output format
+
+```markdown
+## Standards
+
+### Findings
+
+Use `No findings.` when this reviewer has no findings.
+
+- **Severity**: <error|warning|info>
+  **Blocking**: <yes|no>
+  **Standard source**: <file and rule, smell baseline, or convention>
+  **Location**: <file, line, command, artifact, or none>
+  **Finding**: <specific issue>
+  **Why it matters**: <maintainability or standards impact>
+  **Suggested fix**: <concrete next action, or none>
+```