skills/deprecated/review/reviewers/intent.md

Intent reviewer

Review only whether the selected change set satisfies the apparent intent. Do not make Risk, Standards, Evidence, or Documentation findings unless the issue directly changes intent fidelity.

Use the clearest available intent source from context. Possible sources include an implementation task artifact, issue, spec, direct request, PR description, branch context, commit messages, or conversation context. Do not invent requirements. When intent is inferred rather than explicit, say so and treat it with appropriate caution.

Look for missing requested behavior, partial implementation, behavior outside the selected scope, and implementations that appear to satisfy wording while violating the underlying request. Do not require remote branch, PR, or CI outcomes when another workflow step owns those outcomes.

Output format

## Intent

Intent source: <source or none>
Intent confidence: <explicit|inferred|unavailable>

### Findings

Use `No findings.` when this reviewer has no findings.

- **Severity**: <error|warning|info>
  **Blocking**: <yes|no>
  **Intent source**: <task, spec, issue, request, branch context, or none>
  **Location**: <file, line, command, artifact, or none>
  **Finding**: <specific issue>
  **Why it matters**: <intent or correctness impact>
  **Suggested fix**: <concrete next action, or none>