- CONVENTIONAL-COMMITS.md: vendored spec (v1.0.0); CLAUDE.md requires agent-written commits to follow it - tasks 0002-0020: remaining task breakdown of the gitea-axi spec (0019 reframed around the three-tier test taxonomy: unit, integration, end-to-end) - spec, CONTEXT.md, and ADRs 0006/0007/0011: pending design refinements from the planning sessions
35 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Compute reviewDecision client-side via parallel review fetches on pr list
|
|
|
|
Gitea has no aggregated `reviewDecision` field (neither REST nor GraphQL).
|
|
gitea-axi computes it client-side from the reviews list and includes it as a default field on `pr list` and `pr view`, matching gh-axi's interface.
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
For `pr list`, fetch the reviews list for each PR in parallel (one HTTP call per PR) alongside the main list call.
|
|
Derive `reviewDecision` using: `APPROVED` if at least one review has `official=true`, `stale=false`, `dismissed=false` and no non-dismissed `REQUEST_CHANGES` exists; `CHANGES_REQUESTED` if any such `REQUEST_CHANGES` exists; `REVIEW_REQUIRED` otherwise.
|
|
|
|
## Considered Options
|
|
|
|
**Omit reviewDecision from default fields** (rejected) — The field is in gh-axi's default schema for `pr list`.
|
|
Dropping it breaks interface parity and forces agents to issue explicit follow-up calls.
|
|
|
|
**Include as opt-in `--fields` only** (rejected) — Same problem: agents trained on gh-axi expect it by default.
|
|
|
|
**Parallel fetch per PR** (chosen) — One extra HTTP call per PR in the list, all issued in parallel.
|
|
Accepted explicitly: API call cost does not factor into design decisions for this project.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
- `pr list` with N results makes N+1 HTTP calls (list + N review fetches).
|
|
- `official` and `stale` fields are exposed on `pr view --reviews` as Gitea-specific bonus data.
|
|
- The `reviewDecision` field appears in the default schema for both `pr list` and `pr view`.
|
|
|
|
## Amendment (2026-07-10): official-first fallback
|
|
|
|
The original logic required `official=true` for `APPROVED`, but Gitea only marks reviews official under branch protection with required approvals.
|
|
On unprotected repos (the norm on personal instances) every review is `official=false`, making `APPROVED` unreachable — an approved PR would show `required` forever.
|
|
|
|
Amended logic: if any review on the PR carries `official=true`, consider only official reviews (branch-protection semantics preserved); otherwise consider all reviews.
|
|
Within the considered set the derivation is unchanged: `CHANGES_REQUESTED` if any non-dismissed `REQUEST_CHANGES`; `APPROVED` if any non-dismissed, non-stale review with state `APPROVED`; `REVIEW_REQUIRED` otherwise.
|
|
The otherwise-bucket (zero reviews, comment-only) renders `required`; gitea-axi deliberately has no `none` value, since detecting "review not formally required" would need admin-only branch-protection API access.
|